Mertzon City Council December 1 2025
- G. Noelke
- 1 day ago
- 2 min read
Updated: 9 hours ago
Agenda Analysis | Meeting Review | Meeting Documents | Commentary | Last Meeting

The trenching on the IC ISD campus for the flood control structure started in earnest the week of Thanksgiving.

A. Agenda Analysis
Executive session, item 5: This is a meaty one with 3 specific legal reasons listed. Yes, it is lawful for a governmental body to go into a closed session to discuss real estate, to speak to their attorney about pending litigation and to discuss personnel matters. The public may eventually hear what these matters concern, or the issues may be dealt with at the closed part without a vote. They can't vote on a matter in closed session. I am careful not to make guesses about what closed sessions cover; I am not interested in being a rumor mill.
Zoning ordinance discussion with attorney Jeff Betty, item 6: One way for elected folks to get cover for something new is to get their attorney to speak during the meeting to say, "Yep, you can do this" or "No, you shouldn't do this." I served in this role regularly when I represented state agencies on behalf of the Texas Attorney General's Office. Here's some inside baseball: The attorney client relationship here is quite like that of the attorney client relationship involving a private citizen. The governmental body, like a private citizen, is never compelled to accept the advice of the attorney. The client in both situations can disregard the advice of the attorney. The difference, of course, is that a lawyer providing advice to a governmental body, as in this case, does so publicly. This increases the stakes dramatically.
Zoning ordinance, item 7: I'm suspending judgment until the meeting...
The rest, items 8 - 10: These are stock agenda items and should not be disregarded.

B. Meeting Review
Pending

C. Commentary
Here’s a great podcast listen, Eating What You Kill This Thanksgiving, a NYT interview of Steven Rinella.

Pending.
Copyright 2025 G. Noelke





